RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To measure and compare the mean temperature values due to heat generated during the grinding of different prosthetic materials with diamond burs using a high-speed instrument with and without water cooling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 120 disk-shaped specimens (10 × 2 mm), each with a smaller disk in the center (3 × 2 mm), were fabricated from yttrium-stabilized zirconia, monolithic zirconia, glass-ceramic, indirect composite, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and cast metal (Ni-Cr alloy). The specimens were divided into six groups (n = 20) according to material type. The specimens in each group were ground continuously with a high-speed handpiece and diamond burs with (n = 10) and without (n = 10) water cooling until the smaller disks were removed. Two different methods (thermocouple and thermal camera) were used to measure the temperature during the grinding process. Results were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and paired samples t test (P < .05). RESULTS: PEEK had the lowest mean temperature values and metal had the highest values, both with and without water cooling, according to data measured with a thermocouple. Zirconia and monolithic zirconia samples without water cooling had the highest mean temperature values when measured with a thermal camera. Both with and without water cooling, composite samples had the lowest mean temperature value for thermal camera measurements. CONCLUSION: Water cooling is strongly recommended when grinding all prosthetic materials. The heat transferred to the supporting teeth may depend on the thermal conductivity of the material used.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Prosthetic cleansing solutions have been reported to cause retention loss in implant locator attachments due to the chemical alterations of these attachments. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different denture cleansing solutions on attachments with different retention values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 160 polyetheretherketone locator attachments were divided into 4 groups according to their attachment retention values (yellow, pink, clear, and violet). Forty attachments from each group were soaked in four different cleansing solutions (n = 10). The attachments from the four groups were immersed in water, sodium hypochlorite, Corega, and Protefix solutions for a period equivalent to 6 months, according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The locator attachments were then subjected to testing using a universal testing machine. Maximum load to dislodgement according to different solutions was evaluated by one-way ANOVA test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retentive values of attachments was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Among all cleansing solutions, the highest retention value was found in the violet attachments, and the lowest retention value was found in the yellow attachments. The lowest retention value (0.72 ± 0.05 MPa) was observed when the yellow attachments were immersed in Protefix solution, and the highest retention value (1.96 ± 0.15 MPa) was observed when the violet attachments were immersed in the Corega solution. CONCLUSION: For different colored attachments, different cleansing solutions can be suggested to patients.
